In another video, Dr. Sylvia gives the following advice:
- Refuse to be a victim
- Trust your intuition
- Create a narrative
- Educate yourself about your rights
I have refused to be a victim, yet remain a victim. How does that work?
I trust my intuition and have followed that “gut instinct” to protect myself.
I am creating a narrative – see CyberStalked.Me.
I have educated myself – extensively – about my rights. Problem is, law enforcement at any level – nor lawyers – give a damn about my rights.
And it is a well known fact in my community who my 7-year and counting stalker is. Meet Sheboygan’s Cyber Stalker. It is also a well-known fact that I have not been her only victim.
So in spite of all this “good advice”, which, by the way, is repeated by many “experts” in this field, I have to live in the shadows. Waste time constantly evading the witch. Watch my back everywhere – online and off. Go to lengths no average citizen should have to go to merely to have a little bit of privacy.
That is, in no way, allowing me my rights to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”.
What it is, is a living nightmare.
I received an email from “Jacob Jack Lew”. Really!
Before I proceed, allow me to clarify that no, I don’t believe for a millisecond this is legit.
However, in light of current goings-on, could it be a ploy to attempt to get people to send the U.S. Treasury another $150.00???
I thought of sending this to my so-called lawmakers, but what’s the point? None of them actually uphold the law, anyway. So instead I’ll just share this incredible offer supposedly from the U.S. Treasury.
U.S. Department of the Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
My name is “Jacob Jack Lew”. I am the New Secretary of the Treasury under the U.S Department of the Treasury. The executive agency responsible for promoting economic prosperity and ensuring the financial security of the United States. I was confirmed by the United States Senate on February 27, 2013, to serve as the 76th Secretary of the Treasury. Prior to my appointment as the 76th Secretary of the Treasury, I have previously served as White House Chief of Staff.
However, the Good news here is that following the resolution of the meeting held with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the United Nations, an agreement was reached that the sum of $500,000.00 USD must be paid out to you in the form of a compensation. This compensation funds according the World Bank Instruction will be paid to those that have been Scammed, such as beneficiaries Lottery winners/lotto, Contract/inheritance fund, Retired Civil Servants. Hence, by virtue of my position as the 76th Secretary of the Treasury, I have irrevocably instructed the Federal Reserve Board to approve your compensation fund release via issuance of a CERTIFIED CHECK drawn on the Federal Reserve bank, which is the authorized bank for your fund release.
Therefore, as a former White House Chief of Staff under the Obama Administration, I wish to state categorically that a CERTIFIED CHECK of $500,000.00 USD drawn on the Federal Reserve bank will be issued and sent to you via the US Postal Service at no cost to you. Every and all cost associated with the delivery of the CHECK has been pre-paid by the U.S Government. The only cost associated with your fund release is the cost of processing a “Fund Clearance Certificate”, which is estimated to the value of $150.00 USD. The “Fund Clearance Certificate” is required in accordance with the U.S Monetary Policy; and it is the ONLY expenses you will incur before the CHECK will be sent to your mailing address.
You can get more facts about the U.S. Department of the Treasury on this link http://www.treasury.gov/about/Pages/Secretary.aspx
Jacob Jack Lew
Secretary of the Treasury
A “Fund Clearance Certificate”, indeed – all I need do is send $150 – imagine that!
When pigs fly.
From the announcement e-mail…
As many right-to-carry and gun rights issues are state-specific, I am launching “Well Armed Radio” to bring in-state, and very specific analysis and discussion on gun rights and related issues. I felt that gun rights and 2nd Amendment issues were often more of a side-topic for existing talk radio in Wisconsin. As a result, in addition to often being buried in “political” analysis rather than “freedom” analysis, there were many noteworthy topics and angles that were not being covered. Those that were covered were often covered more superficially. It is my goal to, with the help of such an educated audience as the right-to-carry crowd is in Wisconsin, bring a more insightful and principled discussion to the airwaves. The number to call in to the show (646)716-8739 is also listed from the episode page linked above. Please be welcome to call-in. I would love to hear your input during the show.
Right-to-carry and self-defense are strongly rooted in principles of freedom and self-reliance. As such, occasionally our discussion will include other topics of freedom and self-reliance on a larger scale than just right-to-carry. I believe you will find this not only a unique program, but a program that gives you information that you will leverage to live a better life.
I am pleased to announce that Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke will be a featured guest on this Sunday’s show. Sheriff Clarke has been in the national news recently with his insightful Public Service Announcements which speak truthfully to citizens about the role they can take in protecting themselves from being victims of crime.
The direct link page to tune in to Sunday’s premier broadcast is here (you can listen from your pc or your smartphone): http://www.blogtalkradio.com/wellarmedradio/2013/05/13/well-armed-radio–premier
Well Armed Radio’s website is still under construction. If you would like to be informed of future show announcements make sure to “like” the Well Armed Radio facebook page (link below) You can follow Well Armed Radio with these social media resources:
“Follow” the show at http://www.blogtalkradio.com/wellarmedradio
Sent to me via email from a friend, who’s friend actually experienced this recently. Makes some excellent points to those willing to dare to think for themselves.
My Medical Appointment
She was obviously a liberal by her dress and manner. I was thinking of flirting with her, but I didn’t like the phrase she used, “You remind me of my grandfather.”
She asked me what was wrong, and I replied, “I have a cut on my leg; and I think it may be getting infected.”
She said, “Before we start, I have to ask you a few questions. Are you allergic to any medications?”
I replied, “No.”
She said, “Do you have any guns in the house?”
I said, “HUH??”
She replied, “Guns. Do you have any guns in the house?”
I asked, “Why?”
She said, “I’ve got to ask this question. It is required under the Affordable Care Act.”
I asked, “What are you going to do with the data?”
She said, “We compile it, amalgamate it, and submit it to the government.”
I said, “Well, I have a Tommy Gun. I let my kid Tommy play with it.”
She said, “What’s a Tommy Gun? I don‘t think that is the kind of gun they are concerned with.”
With THAT, I knew I had a live one. I said, “It’s similar to a B.A.R., but a little heavier and shorter. I have a B.A.R. also.”
She said, “A B.A.R.?”
I said, “Yes.”
She looked puzzled. Then she brightened up and asked, “Do you have any assault rifles?”
I attempted to look puzzled, and said, “I don’t know. What is an assault rifle?”
She said, “That’s a gun that is used in wars.”
I said, “As a matter of fact, I do. I have a replica of a Revolutionary War musket.”
She began to look a bit exasperated. I pretended not to notice and kept up the appearance of trying to be helpful.
She said, “Do you have anything more modern than that?”
I replied, “Well, yes I do. I have a replica muzzle loader from the Civil War. Do you know the difference between a musket and a muzzle loader?”
She rather peevishly said, “No, I don’t; and I don’t want to. What else do you have?”
I said, “I have an M-1.”
She asked, “What’s that?”
I said, “A rifle.”
She asked, “What kind?”
I replied, “It is called a Garand.”
She rather loudly said, “I don’t care if it is a grand rifle or not. Is it an assault rifle?”
To which I replied, “I don’t know. I don’t know what an assault rifle is. You say it’s a rifle used in war, yet you say that my musket and muzzle loader are not assault rifles.”
She calmed down (a bit) and asked, “Anything else?”
I said, “I have an MG-.30, and an MG-.50. I‘m also part owner of an Apache. But they are not rifles.”
She stated, “Well, then, I’m not interested in them. Anything else.”
I replied, “Well, yes. I also have a 12-gauge and a 20-gauge pump. They are not rifled though.”
She said, “I’m not interested in pumps; I’m interested in guns.”
I replied, “Well, then, I have a Colt, a Luger, a Glock, a bazooka, a Parabellum, a Kalishnikov, a Henry, an Uzi, a Llama, and a Beretta–but they are not rifles.”
She then said, “I’ve had enough of this. I think you’re toying with me. Let me see your leg.”
I then said, “Excuse me, but before you look at my leg, I have a few questions to ask of you.”
She replied, “Of course. What are they?”
I said, “I have given you a lot of information about my guns. I am somewhat concerned about your knowledge and ability to assimilate, make coherent sense of that information, and report it correctly. Do you know the difference between a .22 caliber and a .223 caliber? It’s a rather fundamental difference.”
She replied, “Actually, I don’t.”
I said, “I see. Let me ask some more relevant questions. “How much money do you make?”
She said, “That’s personal, why do you ask?”
I said, “Well, in pushing the Health Care Act, my president cautioned the population about doctors that would amputate a leg rather than treat a cut because they make more money that way. Consequently, I wish to know if you are financially troubled. What kind of car do you drive? What are your house payments? How much is your mortgage? How much credit card debt do you have? Do you have a student loan; if so, how much?”
She said, “I’m not going to answer those questions. You have no right to ask them.”
I then asked, “Do you have training and education in homeopathic techniques? Do you know the benefits/effects of CoQ10, ginseng, fish oil, Creatine, BCAA, and other such herbal treatments?” Do you know the difference between Panax ginseng, American ginseng, and Siberian ginseng?”
She replied, “Well, No!”
I then asked, ”Well, have you studied it at all?”
She replied rather defensively, “NO; it’s all a bunch of hogwash anyway!”
I said, “Oh, then you have read the research on it. What have you read?”
She then said, “I don’t waste my time reading such things. Why are you asking me these questions?”
I said, “Well, if I’m going to turn my body over to you for treatment, I believe it is reasonable for me to know something about your motivation, training, experience, and competence. Do you know anything about the practice of holistic medicine?”
She said, rather angrily “No, I don’t!”
I said, “Oh. O.K. How much experience do you have in practicing medicine?”
She replied, “Well, not very much.”
To which I said, “Well, we all have to start somewhere. What medical school did you go to; what is its rank in terms of other medical schools; where did you intern; and where did you do your residency? What is the rank of the hospital where you did your internship and residency?”
She rather peevishly said, “All my credentials are posted in the waiting room.”
To which I said, “Really? The rank of your medical school is posted in the waiting room? Do you have any experience with leg injuries? If so, how much?”
I guess that was too much for her. She rather crossly said, “I think it would be best if you saw a different doctor.” …and started to leave the room.
I said, “You know, doctor. You asked me irrelevant questions about my guns, and I answered them. Whether or not I own guns is really none of your business and has absolutely nothing to do with any treatment you might prescribe. On the other hand, I ask you questions quite relevant to my situation, and you refuse to answer them. Isn’t that somewhat backwards?”
She said, “But I HAVE to ask those questions. It’s the law.”
To which I replied, “Actually, it is NOT the law. Here is what the law says–taken directly from the Affordable Care Act:”
(1) WELLNESS AND PREVENTION PROGRAMS. A wellness and health promotion activity implemented under subsection (a) (1) (D) may not require the disclosure or collection of any information relating to—(A) the presence or storage of a lawfully-possessed firearm or ammunition in the residence or on the property of an individual; or (B) the lawful use, possession, or storage of a firearm or ammunition by an individual.(2) LIMITATION ON DATA COLLECTION.—None of the authorities provided to the Secretary under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or an amendment made by that Act shall be construed to authorize or may be used for the collection of any information relating to— (A) the lawful ownership or possession of a firearm or ammunition;
(B) the lawful use of a firearm or ammunition; or
(C) the lawful storage of a firearm or ammunition.
You may verify this in the
“Senate Amendment 3276, Sec 2716, part c “Protection of Second Amendment Rights” page 2037 beginning with line 23.
“As you can see, you have broken federal law TWICE–once by asking, and once by collecting data. It is perfectly legal for me to own guns; it is NOT legal for you to ask and/or collect such data. YOU are breaking the law, and yet YOU are the one that is angry. Not only that, but you erroneously stated that you must ask such questions, and you did it in a very authoritative and convincing manner.
You gave me false information, which I then acted upon by answering your questions. On that basis, how can I be expected to trust your medical judgment?
When I attempted to ascertain your medical competency, you became defensive and hostile.”
“There is really no need for me to see another doctor in this practice. I‘ll go somewhere else, where my privacy is respected, and I can trust the information I receive.”
Colonel, U. S. Marine Corps, Retired